‘It May Be Not, It May Be So’ — A Sculpture by Namita Purohit

'It May Be Not, It May Be So', a stone sculpture by Namita Purohit, transforms the fragility of paper into marble, exploring memory, impermanence, resilience, and sustainability while merging handcraft and digital tools to question what we discard and preserve.

SHARE THIS

When we discard something, does its story truly end—or begin again?

This question lies at the heart of ‘It May Be Not, It May Be So’, a marble sculpture created during my residency at the Digital Stone Project in Italy. I have long been drawn to the intersection of architecture and sculpture—a space where form and emotion engage in constant dialogue, and materials hold memory.

This led me to embrace sculpting as a vital part of my practice. Over time, I have explored various media in this pursuit, developing a tactile relationship with clay before ultimately embracing marble. In the mountains near the Apuan Valley—the legendary source of Carrara marble—these explorations became a meditation on material, memory, and transformation.

Sculpture. 'It May be Not, It May Be So' Exhibition at Barga. © Namita Purohit (1)
Sculpture. ‘It May be Not, It May Be So’ Exhibition at Barga. © Namita Purohit

Concept and Themes

The idea began with the fragile gesture of a crumpled piece of paper: discarded and overlooked, yet carrying a quiet poetry revealed by light in its folds. This simple act invited me to question what we reject and why.

Could the discarded hold stories be worth preserving?
Could impermanence itself be transformed into permanence?

Carrara marble, known for its endurance and beauty, carries a heritage reaching back to Roman times and has been revered by artists including Michelangelo. While paper represents fragility, Carrara marble embodies a profound cultural legacy embedded within it. Bringing these extremes together allowed me to explore how materials hold memory in form and texture, challenging the boundaries between strength and delicacy, permanence and impermanence.

Process 1 - Paper studies. 'It May be Not, It May Be So' Exhibition at Barga. © Namita Purohit
Process – Paper studies. ‘It May be Not, It May Be So’. © Namita Purohit

Process

The making of ‘It May Be Not, It May Be So’ was deeply process-led and iterative. It moved through stages and materials, with each medium shaping the next: paper inspiring clay; the form digitised and refined; translated into robotic carving; and finally, hand-carved and finished in stone.

The work also examines how machine and hand connect—how digital tools extend rather than replace the human gesture. Technology became a translator of intent, showing how digital processes can serve rather than dictate design.

Seven-axis robotic milling introduced its own constraints. The complex form required splitting and rejoining the sculpture with a dry joint. This seam, far from hidden, was embraced as an essential part, honouring the act of creation and the memory of the process. The tactile dimension remained central. Hand-carving demanded both rigour and intimacy; stone preserves every action with an honesty that humbles. A slip of the grinder left a tiny hole—a scar etched permanently into the stone. Each stage was less about control than about accepting traces.

Reflections

‘It May Be Not, It May Be So’ captures a moment suspended between presence and absence. It is both an object and a journey, where fragility, memory, and endurance coexist. The work invites reflection on what is vulnerable and what is resilient, recognising that meaning is fluid—shifting with perception, time, and context. For some, it signals vulnerability; for others, resilience. Its ambiguity opens space for multiple interpretations.

The questions posed by the sculpture are equally relevant in architecture. Architecture, too, is lived through perception—through how people feel in spaces and how they connect within them.

Belonging grows not only from form but from the layers of memory a place holds. That memory resides in materials as well.

What do we keep, and what do we discard?

In nature, nothing is ever truly discarded—everything transforms, returns, continues. What stories are lost when we discard too quickly? If we begin to see value in what remains, discarded materials and places can return with a new purpose. Circular design and adaptive reuse are not only practical and responsible ways of building but also ways of keeping memory alive, building in alignment with how nature works.

Exhibited first in Barga in 2023 and later in Altopascio in 2025, this work is rooted in the artistic and cultural landscape of Tuscany while engaging with contemporary debates on sustainability and material poetry. This became Piece Zero of SOTLR, an emerging practice at the intersection of architecture and sculpture, with ongoing work extending these questions across scales.

‘It May Be Not, It May Be So’ began as a fragile gesture in paper and became a marble sculpture, but its questions extend beyond the object itself. They ask how we live with materials, with spaces, and with one another. In the end, the work is less an answer than an open reminder: meaning is never absolute. It may be not, it may be so.

Like what we publish?

AUTHOR

Namita Purohit
Namita Purohit
Profile and Contributions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

The Chunli Guesthouse, Shanghai, China by TEAM_BLDG 1

The Chunli Guesthouse, Shanghai, China by TEAM_BLDG

The Chunli Guesthouse, Shanghai, China by TEAM_BLDG’s response to nature, memory, and the spirit of place. The design takes “Catching” as its spiritual core, emphasizing the relationship between the architecture and the surrounding rice field landscape.

Read More »
Gender. Hysteria. Architecture. | What Might Care Look Like If It Were Not Afraid of Women? 4

Gender. Hysteria. Architecture. | What Might Care Look Like If It Were Not Afraid of Women?

What kinds of spaces exist where women can breathe without being watched? If hysteria no longer exists as a diagnosis, why does its architecture remain? Aditi A., through her research study as a part of the CEPT Writing Architecture course, in the third and last chapter of this series follows the spatial logics that developed to manage hysteria, which continue in the contemporary environments of care safety, and everyday life. If the diagnosis has been discredited, what explains the persistence of its walls?

Read More »
Kirtee Shah on architecture profession at CEPT University alumni meet

“… the way architecture [profession] is perceived and practised, it needs to move from the pedestal to the ground.”—Kirtee Shah

In his presentation at the CEPT Alumni Meet, in January 2026, Kirtee Shah offers “something to think about” for the architects and planners regarding the future of architecture profession. He urges architects to relearn and refocus on service, sustainability, and inclusivity while addressing urban chaos, poor housing, rural neglect, and climate challenges.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards