ICIMOD Annexe Building by Horizon Design Studio

Unbuilt Project: ICIMOD Annexe Building at Kathmandu, by Horizon Design Studio

Unbuilt Project by Horizon Design Studio: The aim was to design a new separate (extension) building at the 15000 sq.m site of ICIMOD, located in Kathmandu. For reference – the site has an existing building for ICIMOD (designed by Architect Tom Crees), which has a traditional Nepali vernacular architectural influence, along with elements from the eight regions (defined by international borders) of the Hindu Kush Himalayan range.
ICIMOD Annexe Building by Horizon Design Studio
ICIMOD Annexe Building by Horizon Design Studio
External CGI – showing the softscaping in front and the main entrance

Unbuilt Project by Horizon Design Studio:
The aim was to design a new separate (extension) building at the 15000 sq.m site of ICIMOD, located in Kathmandu. For reference – the site has an existing building for ICIMOD (designed by Architect Tom Crees), which has a traditional Nepali vernacular architectural influence, along with elements from the eight regions (defined by international borders) of the Hindu Kush Himalayan range.

Design Approach

The proposed block is a free standing building built from local materials. Although the approach towards planning is contemporary, traditional design elements and detailing has been used so the annexe building is not entirely alien to Nepalese architecture.

ICIMOD Annexe Building by Horizon Design Studio
Proposed-masterplan

The building sits at the south east side of the site, and the height and scale of the building are intentionally smaller than the existing building.

ICIMOD Annexe Building by Horizon Design Studio
Location-plan-with-proposed-buildings-footprint

The building has a traditional external appearance, but the design is minimalist and contemporary – focussing on function foremost, and efficient allocation of space.

Spatial Quality

The entrance of the building is a triple-heighted space, giving a welcome feel to the visitors by sheer volume alone. This foyer interlocks with an adjacent double-heighted space, and the two interlock at various levels, providing visual access from several points.

The aim is to create a feeling of openness and transparency in the working environment of this intra-governmental office building, focussed towards being accessible to the local community and serving them.
All the levels to the atrium are connected by a large central staircase. This staircase also serves as a prominent architectural element in the design, and its scale allows for leisurely movement and even interpersonal interaction while using it.

The building consists of three floors above ground level, and a basement parking. The design also allows future expansion and adjustments. The subterranean parking has been provided for visitors and staff, but the design aims to keep the complex pedestrian and minimize vehicular movement on site.

Material Reference

The proposed building has load-bearing walls made of natural stone (as used in the main building) for the ground floor. The first and second floors have exposed brick walls that reflect the traditional Nepalese architecture.

The windows and doors are made from unpolished Nepalese sesau wood, with thick sections.

All balustrades and railings are wooden, and some internal walls are wood-cladded too.

The building structure consists of RCC columns and slabs, while the roof of the building is made from wooden trusses.

All the proposed materials are vernacular, indigenous, and commonly used in Nepal – with high durability and low maintenance requirements.

Drawings:


Project Facts:

Project Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Design Team: Horizon Design Studio – Sunil Yadav, Anil Yadav
Project Status: Proposal / Idea / Unbuilt

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Source - Deccan Chronicle

Wall As a Public Space
“To read public space only as a spatial condition, as a matter of square footage, zoning, or physical access, is to miss half the picture.”
—Reshma Esther Thomas

Reshma Esther Thomas examines how Hyderabad’s flyover pillars, painted with Cheriyal-style murals under the GHMC’s ‘City Art Scape’ initiative, reveal the paradox of managed public space. What appears to be beautification is actually cultural assertion in the wake of the 2014 bifurcation, bureaucratising a surface that once belonged to those without institutional power.

Read More »
Khazans in Slavador du Mundo, Bardez, Goa. © Kusum Priya (1)

The Map That Was Never Yours
“If publicness is reduced to what is legally accessible, then these landscapes were never public to begin with.”
—V.V. Kusum Priya

As part of our editorial: What makes a space public?, V.V. Kusum Priya argues that Section 39A of Goa’s 2024 Town and Country Planning Act this isn’t just a legal issue, and that it’s the erosion of an unrecognised but collectively sustained commons, and a question of what “public” really means and who benefits from the legislations surrounding this.

Read More »
Life on the public spaces in downtown Calcutta. Source - Wikimedia


“Appropriation of public spaces is the genesis of political movements, of ideological apparatus, and of endangering the city’s multi-dimensional fabric.”
—Dr. Seema Khanwalkar

Dr. Seema Khanwalkar, explores how the public spaces in India are dynamic, contested areas shaped by informal economies, migration, and social negotiation. She reveals how the transactional activities democratise ownership of these spaces, while the political and religious appropriation increasingly displaces this organic vitality, creating exclusion and anxiety. This shrinking of inclusive public space threatens urban social fabric, yet remains largely absent from city planning conversations, making it a far deeper crisis than mere encroachment.

Read More »
Sen Kapadia


“… people like Sen [Kapadia] don’t really leave. They become the questions we continue to ask.”
—A Tribute by Nuru Karim

Nuru Karim reflects on his relationship with Sen Kapadia through three transformative “states of being”—as a student, as a studio colleague, and as an independent professional. To capture Sen’s essence, Karim draws on three powerful metaphors: a mountain (commanding yet silent), a banyan tree (generous and sheltering), and a river (unseen yet ever-present). Together, these images paint a portrait of a man whose quiet depth left an indelible mark on all who encountered him.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards