Home for marginlized children, at Thane, by AtArchitecture

atArchitecture designs an efficiently planned functional space served by playful interactive areas for recreation, home for marginalised children.

Home for marginlized children, at Thane, by AtArchitecture 1

This shelter in one of Thane’s slums was established for abandoned children of sex workers to provide them with a safe residential space. Today 30 girls reside here ranging in ages from 3-16.The center also functions as a community gathering space hosting events for senior citizens, women and infants. The current center is poorly planned with insufficient areas to accommodate its varied functions. Our task was to completely redesign the existing center to respond to the needs of its diverse users, climatic challenges and tight site constraints. The ensuing plan is kept simple to maximize on the efficient use of areas with creative solutions applied to in-fills, facades and stairways. What results is an efficiently planned functional space served by playful interactive areas for recreation.

Stacking/planning:

The ground floor of the center is kept open to accommodate community activities for senior citizens, a crèche, women’s development training etc. The space is planned like a veranda opening up to a private courtyard on the north side and partly opening up to adjoining lanes on the other 3 sides, shaded by first floor overhang. The middle floor dedicated to children’s sleeping areas is more enclosed to create a secure and personal environment. Protected by a façade of operable nursery installed louvers on the south, recreational bands are provided towards the east and west with the north side opening up to the private courtyard below. The top floor houses all the storage spaces, study areas and caretaker’s sleeping place. It shelters the children’s living space underneath from direct sun.

The envelope – North South East West:

The north facade is a dead wall shared with an adjoining house so all services are planned against it, keeping the remaining envelope open for ventilation. A vertical nursery is planted on the south to buffer the living areas from the scorching heat. It also functions as a small-scale industry yielding returns in the form of 15% of the center’s maintenance cost. This nursery is installed in adjustable terracotta louvers making it easy to access and maintain the plants. The sun shades, made out of thin folded plates of concrete, on the east and west are used as private recreational areas by converting them into play-stations, furniture etc, giving the center an additional 25m2 of usable area. Central courtyard helps with passive cooling and natural light, reducing the operational energy load.

Construction efficiency:

Wall in-fills consist of custom designed terracotta hollow blocks with one side left open to use as shelves. Fabricated by a terracotta factory in a neighbouring slum, this new construction system helps to involve local artisans. The load bearing members (i.e. the columns, slabs, staircases etc.) are made out of fair faced concrete making it maintenance free and help consume the least amount of floor area compared to any other building material. A raft is used instead of isolated footings, creating an extra underground volume at the nominal cost of retaining peripheral walls, with this space used as a 55,000L rainwater harvesting tank. The courtyard and stairway leading to the first floor merge to form a playful stepped pavilion which acts as an extension of the community space.

Drawings:

 

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Edwin Lutyens' bust which was replaced by C. Rajagopalachari's bust in Rashtrapathi Bhavan

“Changing The Statue Does Not Change the Room”—Geethu Gangadhar on Edwin Lutyens’ Bust Removal

The current Indian government replaced Edwin Lutyens’ bust with freedom fighter C. Rajagopalachari’s at Rashtrapati Bhavan, framing it as decolonisation. But symbolic gestures don’t dismantle colonial mindsets embedded in governance, caste, and institutions. Geethu Gangadhar raises an important question: whether this removal is a way to eradicate colonial baggage or systemic removal of history.

Read More »
Massing during construction, retaining the exposed concrete facade composition, cross columns and profiled beams. Archival collection of Tibet House, 1977. Accessed in 2026

Brutalist India | Tibet House, New Delhi

As part of Brutalist India series Bhawna Dandona writes about Tibet House in New Delhi which is a non-profit cultural centre dedicated to preserving Tibetan heritage, founded in 1965 at the Dalai Lama’s request. The current building’s foundation was laid in 1974, with architect Shivnath Prasad.

Read More »
Vivek Rawal

Architecture, Power, and the Poor | “As a profession, architecture lacks moral position and has become complicit in the neoliberal dispossession of the poor.”—Vivek Rawal

Vivek Rawal argues that architecture—as a profession—is structurally aligned with political and economic power rather than social justice. He critiques how architectural education and practice prioritise developers and real estate over communities, turning housing into a market commodity. Even movements like sustainability and participation, he says, often become tools for elite consumption rather than genuine empowerment. True moral reform, according to Rawal, would mean architects relinquishing control and enabling community-led design and housing decisions.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards