Architectural Internship in India – Samar Ramachandra opines

Are we preparing our new generations to look deeper? Search more broadly? Are we getting them interested in thinking and working beyond self-sustenance?

Student internship is a quintessential part of an architectural education. However, it is increasingly becoming an unmitigated ordeal for many within the community. Affecting both students and practicing architects, the workforce imbalance and issues of ineptitude have created an unfavourable – and often exploitative – situation.  

Inviting the opinions of architects, educators and students, we strive to start a conversation about what can be done to improve this situation. Below, Samarendra M. Ramachandra of Samar Ramachandra Associates share his opinions  about the issue.


Architectural Internship in India - Samar Ramachandra opines 1

We are hurting each other in the profession of architecture.

Every new batch of architectural students – emerging out of the ever increasing number of colleges – faces a lack of decent internship opportunities. Very often, this is followed by a frustrating experience as an intern, leaving students disappointed and disillusioned.

I have attended various forums addressing this issue with the academia and practicing colleagues. I have also conducted some candid-speaking sessions with students. General discontent, it seems, outweighs the specific case scenario.  The situation is being seen in fragments and the blame is always with the other.

The opinions, in general, are as follows:
  • Practicing architects see students as a burden to deal with – increased numbers, accommodation into the office space, demand on time and money. More importantly, the attitude of the seekers! Architects also feel that school evaluation systems are rigid and imposing.
  • Students see the practising fraternity as blocking their career aspirations. They report limited opportunities, undue demands on qualification and the exploitation of their time and effort. More notably, the high handed or negligent attitude of the people at work!
  • The faculty in charge at the schools see the internship as wasted opportunities. They do not usually find the work done in internships representative of the comprehensive experience they intended. Furthermore, schools often find the engagement to be of little relevance to their syllabus as continued education.
Clearly, something is amiss.

I think it is simple – an absence of an attitude towards learning. Giving, taking and sharing in the spirit of learning.

The definition of learning has downgraded to a job seeking tool. We see it as a term implying skill acquisition for gaining prospects to get the materialistic world’s attention. This, therefore, translates into treating an internship as a “getting-on-board project”. Everyone is in a hurry to extract a suitable working experience targeted towards facing a market of consumption. The architect expects the intern to get going – to produce drawings and models for release to clients – and is impatient at any inability to do so. The student expects designing tasks and a stake in participation in all the aspects of the design and development process of an office. The teachers at school leave the students to fend for themselves as long as they return with an admissible “portfolio” of office works.

The expectations are evidently wrong.

It is true that an internship prepares one for facing the real world. Discipline in production of drawings is relevant to understanding an office’s design process. Primarily, though, architecture today requires a whole new level of involvement with diverse fields. We are facing significant challenges to meet the concerns of an increasingly burdened environment.

So, what are we doing to mitigate this problem?

Are we preparing our new generations to look deeper? Search more broadly? Are we fostering, moreover, their interest in thinking and working beyond self-sustenance?

Are we giving interns the exposure they need for working in the domain of contemporary challenges and aspirations? Can we mentor them to develop the ability to work, the sensitivity to realise, and the boldness to face these real issues?

Can’t they be taught to do real research in this context? Surely they can be taught to work on site as well as the office on experimental models and preparing presentations? Can’t they be taught to carry out the same exercises as that of academic environments – but in a real-world scenario?

Interns can be instrumental in delving into the aspects of introspective processes that the working team scarcely finds time for, in their everyday operations.

Can’t practicing architects and their colleagues in the office, then, begin to share not just the work load, but the thought-load too? Can’t we all become the participants of a selfless process?

Maybe it is time we do.

Ar. Ramachandra has also conducted a seminar on Architectural Internships. You can find the videos here, and part 1 of the session below:


Architectural Internship in India - Samar Ramachandra opines 3Samarendra M. Ramachandra completed his B.Arch from IIT Kharagpur with honours. He is the founder and principal architect of Samar Ramachandra Associates, Hyderabad, which also includes SRA Build and SRA Edu.

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Folles de la Salpétrière, (Cour des agitées.) (Madwomen of the Salpétrière. (Courtyard of the mentally disturbed.))

Gender. Hysteria. Architecture. | “How Did a Diagnosis Learn to Draw Walls?”

Did these spaces heal women or teach them how to disappear? Aditi A., through her research study as a part of the CEPT Writing Architecture course, in this chapter follows hysteria as it migrates from text to typology, inquiring how architectural decisions came to stand in for care itself. Rather than assuming architecture responded to illness, the inquiry turns the question around: did architecture help produce the vulnerability it claimed to manage?

Read More »
Gender, Hysteria, and Architecture - The Witch Hunt. Henry Ossawa Tanner. Source - Wikiart

Gender. Hysteria. Architecture. | “When Did Care Become Confinement?”

Was architecture used by society to spatially “manage” women and their autonomy? Aditi A., through her research study as a part of the CEPT Writing Architecture course, examines the period before psychiatry, when fear had already become architectural, tracing how women’s autonomy was spatially managed through domestic regulation, witch hunts, informal confinement, and early institutional planning.

Read More »

A Modernist’s Doubt: Symbolism and the Late Career Turn

Why did acclaimed modernist architects suddenly introduce historical symbolism like arches, decorative elements, and other cultural references into their work after decades of disciplined restraint? Sudipto Ghosh interrogates this 1980s-90s symbolic turn as a rupture in architecture, questioning whether this represents an authentic reconnection with content and memory, or is it a mere superficial gesture towards absent meanings. Drawing from Heidegger’s analysis of the Greek temple, he distinguishes two modes of architectural representation, ultimately judging that this turn was a nascent rebellion against modernism that may have failed to achieve genuine integration of context, material, and memory.

Read More »
Ode to Pune - A Vision. © Narendra Dengle - 1

The City That Could Be: An Ode to Pune

Narendra Dengle, through his poem written in January 2006, presents a deep utopic vision for Pune—what the city could be as an ecologically sustainable, equitable city that balances nature with development. He sets ambitious benchmarks for prioritizing public transport over cars, preserving heritage, addressing slum rehabilitation humanely, and empowering local communities

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

We Are Hiring

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers