METI School, Rudrapur, Bangladesh, by Anna Heringer and Eike Roswag

SHARE THIS

Note: The content below has been curated from publicly available resources.

Project goal 

The philosophy of METI (Modern Education and Training Institute) is learning with joy. The teachers help the children to develop their own potential and to use it in a creative and responsible way. The building reflects these ideas in terms of materials, techniques, and architectural design. The aim of the project is to improve existing building techniques, to contribute to sustainability by utilising local potential, and to strengthen regional identity. 

Context 

Bangladesh is a fertile alluvial land in the Gulf of Bengal and the land with the highest population density in the world. On average, nearly 1000 people live in every square kilometre and over 80% of the population live in rural areas. Much of the vernacular built tradition uses earth and bamboo as a building material; however, construction techniques are error-prone and many buildings lack foundations and damp-proof coursing. Such buildings require regular maintenance, are often prone to damage and last, on average, only 10 years. 

Project aims 

It is particularly important to improve the quality of living in rural areas to counteract the continuing population migration to cities. The primary potential for developing buildings in rural areas is the low cost of labour and locally available resources such as earth and bamboo. 

The project’s main strategy is to communicate and develop knowledge and skills within the local population so that they can make the best possible use of their available resources. Historic building techniques are developed and improved, and the skills are passed on to local tradespeople, transforming, in the process, the image of the building techniques. 

Concept and Design 

METI aims to promote individual abilities and interests, taking into account the different learning speeds of school children and trainees, in a free and open form of learning. It offers an alternative to the typical frontal approach to lessons. The architecture of the new school reflects this principle and provides different kinds of spaces and uses to support this approach to teaching and learning. 

On the ground floor with its thick earth walls, three classrooms are located each with their own access opening to an organically shaped system of ‘caves’ to the rear of the classroom. The soft interiors of theses spaces are for touching, for nestling up against, for retreating into exploration or concentration, on one’s own or in a group. 

The upper floor is by contrast light and open, the openings in its bamboo walls offering sweeping views across the surroundings, its large interior providing space for movement. The view expands across the treetops and the village pond. Light and shadows from the bamboo strips play across the earth floor and contrast with the colourful materials of the saris on the ceiling. 

Building construction and techniques 

The building rests on a 50 cms deep brick masonry foundation rendered with a facing cement plaster. Bricks are the most common product in Bangladesh’s building manufacturing industry. Bangladesh has almost no natural reserves of stone and as an alternative, the clayey alluvial sand is fired in open circular kilns into bricks. These are used for building or are broken down for use as aggregate for concrete or as ballast chippings. Imported coal is used to fire the kilns.

Aside from the foundation, the damp-proof course was the other most fundamental addition to local earthen-building skills. The damp-proof course is a double layer of locally available PE film. The ground floor is realised as load-bearing walls using a technique similar to cob walling. A straw-earth mixture with a low straw content was manufactured with the help of cows and water buffalo and then heaped on top of the foundation wall to a height of 65 cm per layer. Excess material extending beyond the width of the wall is trimmed off using sharp spades after a few days. After a drying period of about a week, the next layer of cob can be applied. In the third and fourth layers, the door and window lintels and jambs were integrated, as well as a ring beam made of thick bamboo canes as a wall plate for the ceiling. 

“It was good to do tests and experiments together before starting the real construction, so we could understand it although we did not know the language. And everybody learnt a lot from each other. I learned how to build strong walls, how to use measurement tools, and the foreigners learnt that the best mixing machines are water buffalos.”

Suresh, loam worker, Rudrapur, Bangladesh

The ceiling of the ground floor is a triple layer of bamboo canes, with the central layer arranged perpendicular to the layers above and beneath to provide lateral stabilisation and a connection between the supporting beams. A layer of planking made of split bamboo canes was laid on the central layer and filled with the earthen mixture analogue to the technique often used in the ceilings of European timber-frame constructions. 

The upper storey is a frame construction of four-layer bamboo beams and vertical and diagonal members arranged at right angles to the building. The end of the frames at the short ends of the building and the stairs also serve to stiffen the building. These are connected via additional structural members with the upper and lower sides of the main beams and equipped with additional wind bracing on the upper surface of the frame. A series of bamboo rafters at half the interval of the frame construction beneath provide support for the corrugated iron roof construction and are covered with timber panelling and adjusted in height to provide sufficient run-off. 

METI School, Rudrapur, Bangladesh, by Anna Heringer and Eike Roswag. Photo by Kurt Hoerbst

“We already feel that this new ideas of the METI building have raised hope and confidence for an improvement of living conditions for the poor in our rural areas.”

Paul Tigga, project partner and CEO, Dipshikha, Bangladesh

The entire budget for the school construction remained within the village and the direct surroundings; the building materials, earth and bamboo, were all local, as were the construction workers. The construction workers were day labourers from the village of Rudrapur. During the construction process, they were trained in improved earth- and bamboo construction techniques. The building techniques were chosen in order to be able to be replicated by the local people and to have a positive effect on the existing, poor housing situations. The school kids were involved in the building process as well to learn the value of sustainable construction and to reflect on it.


Project Drawings:

METI School, Rudrapur, Bangladesh, by Anna Heringer and Eike Roswag.
METI School, Rudrapur, Bangladesh, by Anna Heringer and Eike Roswag.
METI School, Rudrapur, Bangladesh, by Anna Heringer and Eike Roswag.
METI School, Rudrapur, Bangladesh, by Anna Heringer and Eike Roswag.

Project Details:

Name: METI (Modern Education and Training Institute) School or Handmade School
Location: Rudrapur, Dinajpur district, Bangladesh
Area: 325 sq. mts.
Year: Built (2006)
Clients: Dipshikha, Bangladesh
Designed by: Anna Heringer (Design and Concept) and Eike Roswag (Technical planning)
Construction core team (Bangladesh): Raboti Roy, Nikhil Chandra Roy, Buden Chandra Roy, Aminul Islam, Apon Chandra Roy, Suresh Chandra Roy, Jitendra Nath Roy, Sonjib Roy, Satish Chandra Roy, Romesh Roy, Fatik Roy, Bimol Roy, Bimol Roy, Upendra Nath Roy, Khokendra Nath Roy, Susen Roy, Vhomol Chandra Roy
Construction team (Austria/ Germany): Emmanuel Heringer, Stefanie Heringer, Christiane Liebert, Christine Karl, Clemens Bernhardt, Michael Bitto, Ursula Nikodem-Edlinger-Holzinger, Cornelia Reithofer, Veronika Reithofer, Kurt Horbst

Consultants:
Structural engineering, Earth construction consulting: Dr. Christof Ziegert, Uwe Seiler
Consulting, building supervision and training of workers in bamboo construction: Emmanuel Heringer (basket weaver and carpenter), Stefanie Haider (blacksmith)
Landscape architecture: Khondaker Hasibul Kabir, Abdun Nime
Further consulting: Prof. Roland Gnaiger (supervision design), Peter Kugelstatter, Rudolf Sackmauer (structural engineering), Martin Rauch (earthen structures), Oskar Pankratz (climate engineering)
Photographs: Kurt Hoerbst

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More Featured Works

ALive! Reads

Source - Deccan Chronicle

Wall As a Public Space
“To read public space only as a spatial condition, as a matter of square footage, zoning, or physical access, is to miss half the picture.”
—Reshma Esther Thomas

Reshma Esther Thomas examines how Hyderabad’s flyover pillars, painted with Cheriyal-style murals under the GHMC’s ‘City Art Scape’ initiative, reveal the paradox of managed public space. What appears to be beautification is actually cultural assertion in the wake of the 2014 bifurcation, bureaucratising a surface that once belonged to those without institutional power.

Read More
Khazans in Slavador du Mundo, Bardez, Goa. © Kusum Priya (1)

The Map That Was Never Yours
“If publicness is reduced to what is legally accessible, then these landscapes were never public to begin with.”
—V.V. Kusum Priya

As part of our editorial: What makes a space public?, V.V. Kusum Priya argues that Section 39A of Goa’s 2024 Town and Country Planning Act this isn’t just a legal issue, and that it’s the erosion of an unrecognised but collectively sustained commons, and a question of what “public” really means and who benefits from the legislations surrounding this.

Read More
Life on the public spaces in downtown Calcutta. Source - Wikimedia


“Appropriation of public spaces is the genesis of political movements, of ideological apparatus, and of endangering the city’s multi-dimensional fabric.”
—Dr. Seema Khanwalkar

Dr. Seema Khanwalkar, explores how the public spaces in India are dynamic, contested areas shaped by informal economies, migration, and social negotiation. She reveals how the transactional activities democratise ownership of these spaces, while the political and religious appropriation increasingly displaces this organic vitality, creating exclusion and anxiety. This shrinking of inclusive public space threatens urban social fabric, yet remains largely absent from city planning conversations, making it a far deeper crisis than mere encroachment.

Read More

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards