THE NASIK PROJECT | Conversation on India’s Small Cities

Summarising the "Conversation on India's Small Cities", by The Nasik Project, a symposium delving into the question of what constitutes a second-tier or small city beyond mere quantitative metrics.

SHARE THIS

Small Cities play a significant role in India’s decentralised network of urban centers yet the discussions around them are few and far. The two-day symposium by The Nasik Project on India’s small cities began with understanding what constitutes a small city.

Symposium Day 1:

Shreyank Khemalapure presented various scales of small cities and what they entail, touching upon examples to elaborate the character of these cities. It was followed by an engaging conversation with Rajesh Advani.

In the second session, Pushkar Sohoni and Sonal Mithal discussed the histories of small cities. Pushkar traced the transformation of cities such as Solapur to project their changing characteristics over a timeline by uncovering factors contributing to the rise and decline of small cities. Sonal highlighted the history of Surat, a city on the cusp of transformation and growth. She positioned the history of Surat Castle in the context of the city’s past and detailed her work on its conservation.

Catherine and Purva’s observations and questions brought to light further nuances. Sonal’s perspective on contemporizing history to make it relevant today advocated to bridge the gap between the past and the present. Pushkar highlighted the need for a systems approach to our cities, focused on integrating interdisciplinary perspectives.

The last presentation of the day was on practicing in small cities, delivered by Bobby Desai of HCP Design, Planning and Management. He explained the detailed process and execution of planning the Kashi Vishwanath Dham Corridor in Varanasi. As he concluded his presentation, he asked if the project was a big project in a small city or a small project in a big city, before zooming out a satellite image of the city highlighting the scale of the project.

In the moderation session, Nitin Patel and Archis Kulkarni extended the question to the scale of impact of the project and how such projects can be seen as an opportunity to define or rather redefine the way we think about architecture of sacred and religious spaces. 

Day 1 of the symposium. © The Nasik Project
Day 1 of the symposium. © The Nasik Project

Symposium Day 2:

The second day of the symposium began with two interesting presentations by Percy Pithawala and Praveen Bavadekar, exploring the theme of the city as an entity.

Percy discussed his practice based in Vadodara and the architecture competitions he and his students had participated in. He also touched upon architectural education in small cities, by citing his engagement as an academic in Vadodara.

Praveen unpacked the history of Belgaum and situated his practice alongside his personal identity. By showing projects that had contributed to the city of Belgaum, he explored the relation of architecture and the city.

Rahul Dabir and Pooja Khairnar extended the conversation with their questions.

Ruturaj Parekh presented the second session on Practicing in small cities. He began with talking about his personal journey and eventually shared his projects in Bihar and Goa. Ajay Sonar and Amol Suryavanshi moderated the talk.

The keynote speaker was Dr. Praveen Gedam, the divisional commissioner of Nasik. He emphasised the need for citizen participation in the growth of Nasik. His session was moderated by Bakir Zafar and Nitin Kute.

The session was followed by many questions from the audience. By answering the questions, Dr. Gedam spoke about the upcoming 2027 Kumbh Mela in the city and the proposed development of the city’s periphery.

The symposium attempted to generate focussed discussions on select small cities highlighting the research and practices that are meaningfully contributing towards such smaller yet significant urban centres. The discussions have ushered a heightened interest in the city and have initiated a much-needed discussion on our small cities.

Note: The recordings of all the sessions are available on YouTube

Day 2 of the symposium. © The Nasik Project
Day 2 of the symposium. © The Nasik Project

Credits:

Curated by: Yakin Kinger, Swapnil Joshi, and Krushna Rathi.
Advisory panel: Sanjay Patil, Bakir Zafar, Nitin Patel, Ajay Sonar, and Chandrakant Dhamne.
Supported by: IIA Nashik Centre.
Media partner: ArchitectureLive!
Collaborators: INTACH Nashik Chapter, CREDAI Nashik Metro, and IIID Nashik Regional Chapter.
Feature Image: Patterns of Mylapore. © Vinoth Chandar

Like what we publish?

AUTHOR

The Nasik Project
The Nasik Project
Profile and Contributions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

A Chronicle of Architectural Heritage. Prof. Kavas Kapadia reviews Innovative Architecture through the Ages 1

“A Chronicle of Architectural Heritage.” Prof. Kavas Kapadia reviews the latest book, Innovative Architecture through the Ages, by Prof. Ram Sharma

Prof. Kavas Kapadia reviews Innovative Architecture through the Ages, the latest book by Prof. Ram Sharma, a richly illustrated journey through iconic historic and modern buildings across the globe. The review highlights how these works of architecture shape political power, public welfare, monarchy, and religion while deepening our understanding of culture, history, and professional practice.

Read More »
Edwin Lutyens' bust which was replaced by C. Rajagopalachari's bust in Rashtrapathi Bhavan

“Changing The Statue Does Not Change the Room”—Geethu Gangadhar on Edwin Lutyens’ Bust Removal

The current Indian government replaced Edwin Lutyens’ bust with freedom fighter C. Rajagopalachari’s at Rashtrapati Bhavan, framing it as decolonisation. But symbolic gestures don’t dismantle colonial mindsets embedded in governance, caste, and institutions. Geethu Gangadhar raises an important question: whether this removal is a way to eradicate colonial baggage or systemic removal of history.

Read More »
Massing during construction, retaining the exposed concrete facade composition, cross columns and profiled beams. Archival collection of Tibet House, 1977. Accessed in 2026

Brutalist India | Tibet House, New Delhi

As part of Brutalist India series Bhawna Dandona writes about Tibet House in New Delhi which is a non-profit cultural centre dedicated to preserving Tibetan heritage, founded in 1965 at the Dalai Lama’s request. The current building’s foundation was laid in 1974, with architect Shivnath Prasad.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards