Home Within House, at Cambodia, by AtArchitecture

Home Within House, at Cambodia build by AtArchitecture ~ the project can be constructed with a very less number of necessary components, making it cost-effective.

Home Within House, at Cambodia, by AtArchitecture 1

By responding appropriately to the ecological context of the site & the requirements of factory workers, an extremely simple and aesthetically pleasing built environment is designed, by atArchitecture. Each dwelling is part of a cluster, which is formed by the alternating pattern of voids & solids, ensuring courtyards on both sides of each apartment. The utility courtyard containing kitchen garden & the semi-open verandas act as an extension to the entrance vestibule. On the other side, a band of green open space is the community courtyard, commonly enjoyed by living areas of each apartment. The compact form of housing modules and interconnected circulation routes at the ground and first-floor level makes the project easy to move around, contributing positively to its functionality, health & passive surveillance.

 Space and cost-efficiency 

The project can be constructed with a very less number of necessary components, making it cost-effective. A composite of local clay bricks and concrete is used for construction. In the minimal format, every imperative detail of each apartment and user requirements has been satisfied. Most of the spaces being shared either functionally or visually, making the project space-efficient. For instance, the corridor leading to the apartments is also shared as a veranda overlooking the open-to-sky courtyards, and similarly, on the other side, the boxing for recessed windows are shared as a storage cabinet. The layout of the house is kept simple with no permanent partitions or offsets in the rectangular plan, accounting for the flexibility and efficiency of the space.

 Community living- Safe, secure and social 

Semi-open collective facilities such as shops, bike parking, crèche, etc. are integrated at the end of each cluster help create an inclusive environment. Accessible open spaces in the form of series of courtyards become places for social interaction. The continuous row of clusters containing houses, utility court & community court is dotted by 5 larger recreations and playgrounds. The campus is served by simple loop roads and cycle tracks, interconnecting all the clusters, collective facilities and recreational spaces and converges at the riverfront, which has been developed as a public space with the market. The seamless integration of living spaces into the public and community spaces led to the development of a ‘Home’ for the workers within the wider ‘House’ of the community.

Drawings:

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Edwin Lutyens' bust which was replaced by C. Rajagopalachari's bust in Rashtrapathi Bhavan

“Changing The Statue Does Not Change the Room”—Geethu Gangadhar on Edwin Lutyens’ Bust Removal

The current Indian government replaced Edwin Lutyens’ bust with freedom fighter C. Rajagopalachari’s at Rashtrapati Bhavan, framing it as decolonisation. But symbolic gestures don’t dismantle colonial mindsets embedded in governance, caste, and institutions. Geethu Gangadhar raises an important question: whether this removal is a way to eradicate colonial baggage or systemic removal of history.

Read More »
Massing during construction, retaining the exposed concrete facade composition, cross columns and profiled beams. Archival collection of Tibet House, 1977. Accessed in 2026

Brutalist India | Tibet House, New Delhi

As part of Brutalist India series Bhawna Dandona writes about Tibet House in New Delhi which is a non-profit cultural centre dedicated to preserving Tibetan heritage, founded in 1965 at the Dalai Lama’s request. The current building’s foundation was laid in 1974, with architect Shivnath Prasad.

Read More »
Vivek Rawal

Architecture, Power, and the Poor | “As a profession, architecture lacks moral position and has become complicit in the neoliberal dispossession of the poor.”—Vivek Rawal

Vivek Rawal argues that architecture—as a profession—is structurally aligned with political and economic power rather than social justice. He critiques how architectural education and practice prioritise developers and real estate over communities, turning housing into a market commodity. Even movements like sustainability and participation, he says, often become tools for elite consumption rather than genuine empowerment. True moral reform, according to Rawal, would mean architects relinquishing control and enabling community-led design and housing decisions.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards