Brutalist India | Shri Ram Centre, New Delhi

As part of Brutalist India series Bhawna Dandona writes about Shri Ram Centre, New Delhi, consructed in 1968, sponsored by the Shri Ram family, designed by Shiv Nath Prasad, along with guidance from Ebrahim Alkazi and the structural expertise of Mahendra Raj.

SHARE THIS

Shri Ram Centre: View showing the cylindrical mass below with overhanging cuboid supported by coffered ceiling and ribbed columns. © Prashansa Sachdeva
Shri Ram Centre: View showing the cylindrical mass below with an overhanging cuboid supported by a coffered ceiling and ribbed columns. © Prashansa Sachdeva

Constructed in 1968, the Shri Ram Centre stands for an expression of structural and programmatic integrity. Situated in the heart of Delhi, adjacent to other cultural institutions at Mandi House, the 0.25 Ha plot holds a significant position. It was sponsored by the Shri Ram family under Mrs Panna Bharat Ram, with supervision from Vinay Bharat Ram (who was active in promoting dance, drama and music).

The client’s needs were extensive considering the small site available, which provided an opportunity to its architect, Shiv Nath Prasad, along with guidance from Ebrahim Alkazi, to express individual functions at different levels, using distinct forms supported by independent structural supports. The design was shaped by the structural expertise of engineer Mahendra Raj and the execution by contractor Tirath Ram.

The expression chosen to display the functions and add a dramatic outlook to the building resulted in a Brutalist composition of a square parasol theatre placed on a cylindrical core, both cast in situ concrete, resolved through two distinct structural systems. Visually, this distinct composition and choice of a cast concrete facade resulted in a language like none other in the city. Windows on the square facade with slanting concrete louvres added the correct amount of rhythm and poetry to it that aligns with the rhythm of the coffer slab beneath.

One can notice fine grains of the formwork still present on the facade. Other details, such as a miniature version of a waterspout that is much observed in many other modernist structures, especially from Corbusier’s Chandigarh buildings, can be found at the Shri Ram Centre as well.

Supported on circumferential and radial beams cantilevering out of six columns, the 650-person drum-shaped auditorium appears to be floating above the ground, anchored in space by the parasol roof, which houses the 31m x 31 m rehearsal hall. The hall is supported on four independent cross-shaped columns placed at 19 metres centres with 6 metres cantilevers all around.

The auditorium is 21 metres in diameter and is enclosed by a hollow concrete wall, also supporting its balcony. The hollow wall is pinned at the bottom on the circumferential beam and at the top to the parasol slab, creating a balancing couple that counteracts the cantilever moment generated by the balcony.

The final product that we see is quite different from the designs originally proposed by the architect. For instance, the floating effect of the building, now its most distinct feature, was introduced by the structural changes suggested by Mahendra Raj.

In Raj’s words,

“Shiv Nath Prasad was a very appreciative man. When given the suggestion of the balcony and the separation of the structures on the four columns, he was very happy and integrated these ideas in the design. Tirath Ram Ahuja, an experienced contractor who worked with Indian and foreign architects on many embassies and significant buildings like the Ashoka Hotel, was the contractor on board with the architect-engineer duo.”

Gallery:

Sources:

  • Architecture in India. Paris: Electa Moniteur et Association Française d’Action Artistique, 1985.
  • Mehta, Vandini, Rohit Raj Mehndiratta, and Ariel Huber. The Structure: Works of Mahendra Raj. Zurich: Park Books AG, 2016.

Credits:

  • Prashansa Sachdeva, Research Associate
  • Interview: Mr Deolalikar, Plumbing Engineer, and son of Mr G.B. Deolalikar

Keywords:

brise-soleil, natural formwork, shear walls, radial beams, parasol

Like what we publish?

AUTHOR

Bhawna Dandona
Bhawna Dandona
Profile and Contributions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

Source - Deccan Chronicle

Wall As a Public Space
“To read public space only as a spatial condition, as a matter of square footage, zoning, or physical access, is to miss half the picture.”
—Reshma Esther Thomas

Reshma Esther Thomas examines how Hyderabad’s flyover pillars, painted with Cheriyal-style murals under the GHMC’s ‘City Art Scape’ initiative, reveal the paradox of managed public space. What appears to be beautification is actually cultural assertion in the wake of the 2014 bifurcation, bureaucratising a surface that once belonged to those without institutional power.

Read More »
Khazans in Slavador du Mundo, Bardez, Goa. © Kusum Priya (1)

The Map That Was Never Yours
“If publicness is reduced to what is legally accessible, then these landscapes were never public to begin with.”
—V.V. Kusum Priya

As part of our editorial: What makes a space public?, V.V. Kusum Priya argues that Section 39A of Goa’s 2024 Town and Country Planning Act this isn’t just a legal issue, and that it’s the erosion of an unrecognised but collectively sustained commons, and a question of what “public” really means and who benefits from the legislations surrounding this.

Read More »
Life on the public spaces in downtown Calcutta. Source - Wikimedia


“Appropriation of public spaces is the genesis of political movements, of ideological apparatus, and of endangering the city’s multi-dimensional fabric.”
—Dr. Seema Khanwalkar

Dr. Seema Khanwalkar, explores how the public spaces in India are dynamic, contested areas shaped by informal economies, migration, and social negotiation. She reveals how the transactional activities democratise ownership of these spaces, while the political and religious appropriation increasingly displaces this organic vitality, creating exclusion and anxiety. This shrinking of inclusive public space threatens urban social fabric, yet remains largely absent from city planning conversations, making it a far deeper crisis than mere encroachment.

Read More »
Sen Kapadia


“… people like Sen [Kapadia] don’t really leave. They become the questions we continue to ask.”
—A Tribute by Nuru Karim

Nuru Karim reflects on his relationship with Sen Kapadia through three transformative “states of being”—as a student, as a studio colleague, and as an independent professional. To capture Sen’s essence, Karim draws on three powerful metaphors: a mountain (commanding yet silent), a banyan tree (generous and sheltering), and a river (unseen yet ever-present). Together, these images paint a portrait of a man whose quiet depth left an indelible mark on all who encountered him.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards