The Blind Chase for Master’s in Architecture

As quite a few architects pursue post-graduation studies in architecture for job market opportunities, firm dreams, or specialization, despite unclear benefits and high costs, Saumya Bansal talks about alternatives that offer practical skills and less financial risk.

SHARE THIS

Why has Master's in Architecture Become the New Trend? Source: Imagen
Source: Imagen

If architecture were any other field, the preference for a postgraduate degree would immediately be seen as a pursuit of higher education, driven by the goals of research, specialist corporate jobs, or academia. However, in architecture, the mad rush to fill out master’s applications is a curious spectacle because:

  • There is no clear evidence that a master’s degree in India helps students easily land well-paying jobs.
  • The opportunities for research during the degree are almost non-existent.
  • Becoming a professor of architecture (after the master’s and PhD) is a time-consuming journey and doesn’t naturally appeal to many late millennials or Gen Z.

So, why are so many opting for a post-graduate in architecture?

For many, the unspoken reason is the tough job market. Staying in college feels like a way to delay the trials of the job market. Good jobs are hard to find, and when they do appear, they don’t pay well. In India, architecture colleges are clustered in Tier 1 cities like Mumbai, Chennai, and Bengaluru. A mid-senior architect makes about ₹25,000 per month, barely enough to pay rent, keep the lights on, and cover other basic needs.

There’s another category of students who are driven by a desire to start their firms. Many take the plunge, only to realize after a few years how difficult it is to sustain in the current market. Finding clients is hard; serving them profitably, even harder. Reality becomes evident to the soon-to-graduate students as well, so continuing education becomes a safety net.

But for a select few, the motivation is more focused. A post-graduate degree can become a gateway to specialist jobs at top firms, particularly in fields like urban planning and heritage conservation.

Graduating from reputed colleges like the School of Planning and Architecture (SPA) or CEPT University gives students a better shot at landing roles in reputed firms. This path, however, remains the exception rather than the rule.

For others, the allure of studying abroad shines brighter than anything India has to offer. The core motivation here is a desire to break free from their current town, city, or life. Many students, especially those stuck in toxic workplaces for meagre salaries, see the post-graduation abroad as their last-ditch effort to escape.

Lastly, for those who can afford it, a post-graduation is simply a two-year break. Stepping out of the industry to refresh, re-skill, and then re-enter feels like hitting the reset button.

The Risks You May Not See

While a post-graduation degree may seem like a smart move, most candidates don’t realize the hidden risks until it’s too late.

The first big risk—costs. Tuition fees are only the beginning. Spending another two years in education means two more years without a salary, professional experience, and benefits like insurance and provident fund.

For those who have already worked in the industry, going back to school can feel like starting over. It’s common for them to end up back at entry-level jobs, even though they’re older and more experienced.

If you’re considering a postgraduate degree abroad, brace yourself for significant expenses. Studying in the USA, the UK, or Canada can easily set you back ₹30L to ₹40L a year, not including living expenses. Many students end up taking loans, placing heavy financial pressure on themselves and their families. You’ll rarely see someone confess on LinkedIn that their family had to forfeit assets to the bank because they couldn’t repay their education loan—but it happens more often than you think.

Beyond the financial burden, not all international programs are worth the hype or the cost. Landing a job in a foreign country can also be far more difficult than students anticipate. Few think about the countless hoops they’ll have to jump through in terms of visas and licensing requirements. The UK, France, and several European countries, in particular, make it extremely difficult for international students to work as architects. Even in the USA, where you can work in a firm without being licensed, obtaining a valid work visa is a major hurdle.

And what happens after you get your degree?

Many students assume that a master’s will guarantee them a job in their desired field, but that’s not always the case. Some will realize that they’ve hyper-specialized in a field with limited opportunities. They find themselves overqualified for bachelor’s-level jobs and underqualified for generalist roles. While being a specialist can be beneficial, it often restricts your flexibility in the job market.

What Could You Do Instead?

So, what’s the alternative? Should you follow the crowd and pursue a master’s, or is there a better way forward?

Here’s some advice from someone who’s seen both sides: get into the industry first. Master your craft in the field—learn the hands-on skills that come from actively contributing to projects, meeting client expectations, and handling real deadlines. These experiences are more valuable than what you’d find in a classroom.

If your dream is to start your firm, focus on building a business that stands out. Be tech-first. Build systems that can support remote work so you can hire without geographic constraints.

That said, if you’re genuinely passionate about academia, specializing in a specific sub-field, or moving abroad, a master’s might make sense. But don’t make this decision based on hope alone. Weigh the pros and cons carefully. What are you truly gaining? Will this degree help you achieve your goals, or are you simply delaying the inevitable?

When to opt for a postgraduate?

Let’s be clear—a master’s can supercharge the right career. But it’s not for everyone. Opt for master’s if:

  • You’ve got a specific niche that demands specialized knowledge, and you’ve found programs that place graduates in decent jobs.
  • You can pay without drowning in loan debt, and have snagged scholarships that make sense financially.
  • You’ve worked in the field and know exactly how this degree fits your career trajectory.
  • You’ve solved the international visa puzzle (for studying abroad) and confirmed through actual graduates—not brochure success stories—that it’s worth it.

A strategic master’s can be powerful. The right program expands networks and can boost professional growth in specialized fields. For some, it’s the leap from stuck to successful.

Just remember: it’s an investment, not a rescue plan. Choose wisely.


Feature Image – AI Generated

Like what we publish?

[coauthors_box]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

Folles de la Salpétrière, (Cour des agitées.) (Madwomen of the Salpétrière. (Courtyard of the mentally disturbed.))

Gender. Hysteria. Architecture. | “How Did a Diagnosis Learn to Draw Walls?”

Did these spaces heal women or teach them how to disappear? Aditi A., through her research study as a part of the CEPT Writing Architecture course, in this chapter follows hysteria as it migrates from text to typology, inquiring how architectural decisions came to stand in for care itself. Rather than assuming architecture responded to illness, the inquiry turns the question around: did architecture help produce the vulnerability it claimed to manage?

Read More »
Gender, Hysteria, and Architecture - The Witch Hunt. Henry Ossawa Tanner. Source - Wikiart

Gender. Hysteria. Architecture. | “When Did Care Become Confinement?”

Was architecture used by society to spatially “manage” women and their autonomy? Aditi A., through her research study as a part of the CEPT Writing Architecture course, examines the period before psychiatry, when fear had already become architectural, tracing how women’s autonomy was spatially managed through domestic regulation, witch hunts, informal confinement, and early institutional planning.

Read More »

A Modernist’s Doubt: Symbolism and the Late Career Turn

Why did acclaimed modernist architects suddenly introduce historical symbolism like arches, decorative elements, and other cultural references into their work after decades of disciplined restraint? Sudipto Ghosh interrogates this 1980s-90s symbolic turn as a rupture in architecture, questioning whether this represents an authentic reconnection with content and memory, or is it a mere superficial gesture towards absent meanings. Drawing from Heidegger’s analysis of the Greek temple, he distinguishes two modes of architectural representation, ultimately judging that this turn was a nascent rebellion against modernism that may have failed to achieve genuine integration of context, material, and memory.

Read More »
Ode to Pune - A Vision. © Narendra Dengle - 1

The City That Could Be: An Ode to Pune

Narendra Dengle, through his poem written in January 2006, presents a deep utopic vision for Pune—what the city could be as an ecologically sustainable, equitable city that balances nature with development. He sets ambitious benchmarks for prioritizing public transport over cars, preserving heritage, addressing slum rehabilitation humanely, and empowering local communities

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

We Are Hiring

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers