Pedagogical exploration in architecture to increase quality of practice - Shantanu Poredi, Mobile Offices

Pedagogical exploration in architecture to increase quality of practice – Shantanu Poredi, Manisha Agarwal, Mobile Offices

Architects Shantanu Poredi and Manisha Agarwal higlighted how the pandemic has reflected their team's sustained spirits by taking up new areas of work within architecture, while mainstream practice came to an unforeseen hiatus. The lockdown was also an opportunity for the architects to thrive on their potential with pedagogical exploartion, thanks to the growing number of remote teaching methods. The architects further emphasised that the team hung in together by focussing on the studio's research in the state of Architectural Competitions around the world. Meanwhile, the lockdown was also a phase for emerging architects and graduates to equip new skills which would have otherwise appeared impossible.
Pedagogical exploration in architecture to increase quality of practice - Shantanu Poredi, Mobile Offices

Highlights from the discussion

“How we approach our practice has evolved as a part of our work’s direction. It has become apparent in our work that we emphasise social sustainability. It involves processes of how people use spaces and how they interact with each other there.”

“We realized that our whole team was working with certain fears. We made efforts to retain the team entirely during this period. Some projects were under construction and required drawings urgently. We used the lockdown time effectively and worked longer than the usual hours to deliver. Keeping the morale of the team was one of the biggest challenges amidst the many cases of lay-offs during the pandemic.”

“The general slowing down and extra precautions needed for interacting with new people were not effective for us. We did not call people from outside and many meetings which are done at sites are usually in the open, which did not get affected. But internal discussions have become possible through virtual meetings. We also got into a system of virtual meets with team members who are far away and other consultants too. We did not have to spend that much time travelling which made the process easier.  “

“I think the fact that one doesn’t need to always be in the office for practising architecture is important learning. Women usually couldn’t travel earlier because they had children and other commitments. For women generally, the lockdown was an additional advantage where they could be at home and still work with the Office.”

– Manisha Agarwal

“Homes are the most challenging to design, we believe, primarily because it is hard to define how somebody else should live. It’s a personal thought of somebody else and we find it challenging to define it. Homes are complex too as there are many stakeholders in the house from the little dog to the domestic helpers, the grandparents, the visitors and more. Homes are in a small world but a complex one. “

“The program of an architecture project defines how we interact with each other. A meeting room, for instance, is a formal way of stating how we are required to interact. The ancillary spaces from the circulation to balconies to terraces are usually supporting the main program. We collectively call them non-programmed spaces. Stretching the non-programmed spaces depending on a project type can potentially occupy 35% to 40% of the volume, thereby redefining how we interact. Social sustainability is then achieved by evolving interactive spaces. Sometimes very interesting relationships come out of it. “

” ‘Mobile Offices’ came out from the fact that we didn’t have a physical office initially. I and Manisha worked from each of our homes. The other partner worked from his balcony, and sometimes we’d all be working in my kitchen. Since we were all teaching, we would sometimes work from the computer lab at KRVIA. People would ask us where our office was and we would say that ours is a mobile office, or that our laptop is our office.”

“We believe that pedagogy and practice should go hand in hand. We expect to teach and be able to learn from it to inform our studio. We don’t see it only as a service to society, but that it should inform our practice eventually. The lockdown was also an opportunity to teach more schools since we didn’t have to go there physically. “

“There are some schools that take their jury process quite seriously. They make it into a resourceful discussion and are even able to get more people over to participate. But there are some schools that don’t look at a final year thesis as a discussion. They look at it as a deliverable and somebody with the power to just grade it monitors the process. Architecture is about negotiation. If I design without these introspections, I don’t think the world would be a great place.”

“Architecture as a basic education program has become very generic and it impacts the profession too. It should rather be a design learning program in addition to helping us specialize in any allied areas too. I also feel that if students think that the undergrad program gives them all the answers they seek, it does not really do that.” 

“Our complete physical world and the limitations of Mumbai were encouraged to be reorganized during the pandemic. I love coming to the office and working together. But I can’t let it be something that also limits me.”

-Shantanu Poredi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Source - Deccan Chronicle

Wall As a Public Space
“To read public space only as a spatial condition, as a matter of square footage, zoning, or physical access, is to miss half the picture.”
—Reshma Esther Thomas

Reshma Esther Thomas examines how Hyderabad’s flyover pillars, painted with Cheriyal-style murals under the GHMC’s ‘City Art Scape’ initiative, reveal the paradox of managed public space. What appears to be beautification is actually cultural assertion in the wake of the 2014 bifurcation, bureaucratising a surface that once belonged to those without institutional power.

Read More »
Khazans in Slavador du Mundo, Bardez, Goa. © Kusum Priya (1)

The Map That Was Never Yours
“If publicness is reduced to what is legally accessible, then these landscapes were never public to begin with.”
—V.V. Kusum Priya

As part of our editorial: What makes a space public?, V.V. Kusum Priya argues that Section 39A of Goa’s 2024 Town and Country Planning Act this isn’t just a legal issue, and that it’s the erosion of an unrecognised but collectively sustained commons, and a question of what “public” really means and who benefits from the legislations surrounding this.

Read More »
Life on the public spaces in downtown Calcutta. Source - Wikimedia


“Appropriation of public spaces is the genesis of political movements, of ideological apparatus, and of endangering the city’s multi-dimensional fabric.”
—Dr. Seema Khanwalkar

Dr. Seema Khanwalkar, explores how the public spaces in India are dynamic, contested areas shaped by informal economies, migration, and social negotiation. She reveals how the transactional activities democratise ownership of these spaces, while the political and religious appropriation increasingly displaces this organic vitality, creating exclusion and anxiety. This shrinking of inclusive public space threatens urban social fabric, yet remains largely absent from city planning conversations, making it a far deeper crisis than mere encroachment.

Read More »
Sen Kapadia


“… people like Sen [Kapadia] don’t really leave. They become the questions we continue to ask.”
—A Tribute by Nuru Karim

Nuru Karim reflects on his relationship with Sen Kapadia through three transformative “states of being”—as a student, as a studio colleague, and as an independent professional. To capture Sen’s essence, Karim draws on three powerful metaphors: a mountain (commanding yet silent), a banyan tree (generous and sheltering), and a river (unseen yet ever-present). Together, these images paint a portrait of a man whose quiet depth left an indelible mark on all who encountered him.

Read More »
Sen Kapadia

Nirbhaya Nirgun
“Sen [Kapadia] found his own light early. He followed it without apology and without detour, and never let anyone dim it.”
—A Tribute by Pinkish Shah

Pinkish Shah’s homage to Sen Kapadia, celebrates him as fearless and formless in both life and work. Intellectually rooted in Louis Kahn and Sri Aurobindo, Sen pursued architecture that transcended form toward essential silence. Known for his courage, he maintained quiet, unwavering independence throughout his career.

Read More »
Prof Shireesh Atmaram Deshpande

“Professor Shireesh Deshpande chose the far more difficult task: to mould young minds into thoughtful, responsible, and rooted architects.”—A Tribute by Sarbjit Singh Bagha

Sarbjit Singh Bagha shares his tribute to Prof. Shireesh Atmaram Deshpande (1934–2026), a pioneering figure in Indian architectural education who passed away on 10 April 2026 at 91. Known affectionately as “Dada,” he spent nearly four decades at VNIT Nagpur, founding India’s first M.Arch. programme and introducing innovative pedagogy. He served as President of the Indian Institute of Architects (1992–1994). Choosing teaching over professional practice, he shaped generations of architects.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards