Garima Patel, Mathew Ghosh Internship

Mathew and Ghosh Architects mentioned, taking the certificate course was mandatory for internship – Garima Patel

Garima Patel talks about Mathew and Ghosh Architects’ internship and the mandatory L-studio program.
Garima Patel, Mathew Ghosh Internship

With the increasing focus and the growing discussions on the issue of unpaid internships in the architecture profession in India, ArchitectureLive! is currently in the process of connecting with some past interns of Mathew and Ghosh Architects for their response with regards to the recently published article on Mathew and Ghosh Architects (MGA). Meanwhile, some of the students who had previously applied for an internship at MGA, came forward to share their experiences with us.

Amongst these students is Garima Patel, an architect, and CEPT University alumni, who had applied for an internship in 2019 at MGA. While confirming the unpaid internship provided by MGA, she mentioned,

I knew it had an unpaid internship as one of my seniors had done it in 2017. I was fine with it as the firm had good work and I wanted to learn with them. Within 15 mins of sending my application, they replied with an acceptance letter and their ‘certificate program’ for which I had to pay INR 55,000 to do an internship.

According to her, the offer letter sent via e-mail, besides including the perks of the said internship, mentioned the necessary conditions that needed to be fulfilled as well,

“The perks included attending ‘talks’ of several distinguished architects who are regular visitors and visiting faculties at CEPT! There was also the denial of a certificate if attendance was below 75%. They had clearly mentioned that there would be no stipend and if I wanted to do an internship taking the certificate course was mandatory.”

Besides debunking the claims made by the design practice regarding their L-studio and internship programs, Garima voices her concern,” Having this practice is already a wrong thing. Worse is when they lie and say that they don’t take ownership.”

While we are in the process of verifying the claims and the details of other students, we applaud those coming forward to share their experiences and, in turn, encourage others to do the same.

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Kirtee Shah on architecture profession at CEPT University alumni meet

“… the way architecture [profession] is perceived and practised, it needs to move from the pedestal to the ground.”—Kirtee Shah

In his presentation at the CEPT Alumni Meet, in January 2026, Kirtee Shah offers “something to think about” for the architects and planners regarding the future of architecture profession. He urges architects to relearn and refocus on service, sustainability, and inclusivity while addressing urban chaos, poor housing, rural neglect, and climate challenges.

Read More »
Folles de la Salpétrière, (Cour des agitées.) (Madwomen of the Salpétrière. (Courtyard of the mentally disturbed.))

Gender. Hysteria. Architecture. | “How Did a Diagnosis Learn to Draw Walls?”

Did these spaces heal women or teach them how to disappear? Aditi A., through her research study as a part of the CEPT Writing Architecture course, in this chapter follows hysteria as it migrates from text to typology, inquiring how architectural decisions came to stand in for care itself. Rather than assuming architecture responded to illness, the inquiry turns the question around: did architecture help produce the vulnerability it claimed to manage?

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

We Are Hiring

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers