House S in Banglore by Design Integratus

House S, Bangalore, by Design Integratus

Designed on a small site in Bangalore, House S by Design Integratus is designed on a tight budget and in response to its densely populated context. The house is divided into three zones vertically- the private (second floor), public (first and upper ground) and semi public (ground and lower ground) zones.
House S in Banglore by Design Integratus
House S in Banglore by Design Integratus

The house was designed on a small site of 20 ft x 40 ft for a working couple. The site was located in a densely populated residential locality, where most of the surrounding buildings either share walls or have little setback between them.

Keeping the shoestring budget and context in mind, the idea was to create an introverted building which could have enough light and openness to create a comfortable environment. To enhance this experience, the possibilities of creating different volumes inside the small area, by playing with the floor planes at different heights, were also explored.

Another important objective was to restrict the height of the building to match the surrounding fabric and introduce skylights to get the natural light deep into the shell of the building.

The house was divided into three zones vertically- the private (second floor), public (first and upper ground) and semi-public (ground and lower ground).

The private zone was designed to consist of two bedrooms positioned on either end of the building, divided by the central bay of bathrooms inserted between the rooms.  The master bedroom faced the road with a large standout and the children’s bedroom was pushed to the rear end. Skylights on the roof ensured privacy and keep the interiors filled with light all the time, giving the end user flexibility to keep windows closed at times, due to the close proximity of neighbouring buildings.

A  Living room with a high ceiling spilling out into an open-to-sky courtyard at the rear side of the property blurred the boundaries between the inside and outside of the house. The dining and kitchen were planned on a split level besides the living room, forming a single public zone connected visually to the landscape in the courtyard.

Taking advantage of the space created by the split levels, a foyer was inserted, the car park was planned below the kitchen and a partially sunk multipurpose room below the living area

The house was set back from the edge of the property on three sides, with the rear being the deepest. The Left side of the building shares a common wall with the neighbouring property. A service core consisting of the staircase and secondary rooms like the pooja/utility were positioned on this side, to keep external walls free, for creating punctures.  A secondary staircase was introduced in the setbacks on the right side connecting the entrance court to the living area.

The choice of materials for the inside of the house was restricted to neutral tones of white-coloured walls, grey colour of the exposed concrete ceiling/staircase and a small portion of polished wood on slats and railing trims, to bring warmth to the whole pallet.

The only elevation facing the road was formed by white-coloured horizontal and vertical bands on the edges, with a sizable area of the exposed concrete surface having minimal fenestration. All the elements on the external skin were tied together with steel members and wooden slats creating a simple façade, compared to the very loud and colourful surroundings.

Drawings

Project Facts

Location: Bangalore, India
Project type:  Architecture – Residential
Area: 1800 sft / 170 sqm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Source - Deccan Chronicle

Wall As a Public Space
“To read public space only as a spatial condition, as a matter of square footage, zoning, or physical access, is to miss half the picture.”
—Reshma Esther Thomas

Reshma Esther Thomas examines how Hyderabad’s flyover pillars, painted with Cheriyal-style murals under the GHMC’s ‘City Art Scape’ initiative, reveal the paradox of managed public space. What appears to be beautification is actually cultural assertion in the wake of the 2014 bifurcation, bureaucratising a surface that once belonged to those without institutional power.

Read More »
Khazans in Slavador du Mundo, Bardez, Goa. © Kusum Priya (1)

The Map That Was Never Yours
“If publicness is reduced to what is legally accessible, then these landscapes were never public to begin with.”
—V.V. Kusum Priya

As part of our editorial: What makes a space public?, V.V. Kusum Priya argues that Section 39A of Goa’s 2024 Town and Country Planning Act this isn’t just a legal issue, and that it’s the erosion of an unrecognised but collectively sustained commons, and a question of what “public” really means and who benefits from the legislations surrounding this.

Read More »
Life on the public spaces in downtown Calcutta. Source - Wikimedia


“Appropriation of public spaces is the genesis of political movements, of ideological apparatus, and of endangering the city’s multi-dimensional fabric.”
—Dr. Seema Khanwalkar

Dr. Seema Khanwalkar, explores how the public spaces in India are dynamic, contested areas shaped by informal economies, migration, and social negotiation. She reveals how the transactional activities democratise ownership of these spaces, while the political and religious appropriation increasingly displaces this organic vitality, creating exclusion and anxiety. This shrinking of inclusive public space threatens urban social fabric, yet remains largely absent from city planning conversations, making it a far deeper crisis than mere encroachment.

Read More »
Sen Kapadia


“… people like Sen [Kapadia] don’t really leave. They become the questions we continue to ask.”
—A Tribute by Nuru Karim

Nuru Karim reflects on his relationship with Sen Kapadia through three transformative “states of being”—as a student, as a studio colleague, and as an independent professional. To capture Sen’s essence, Karim draws on three powerful metaphors: a mountain (commanding yet silent), a banyan tree (generous and sheltering), and a river (unseen yet ever-present). Together, these images paint a portrait of a man whose quiet depth left an indelible mark on all who encountered him.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards