When a vibrant design studio is distanced - Anagram, Madhav Raman

I understand this virus as a Gandhian-Virus and that’s a crazy thing. – Madhav Raman, Anagram Architects

Madhav Raman, principal architect at Anagram Architects, holds the experience during the pandemic that the Corona Virus changed people's belief systems. As he termed it a Gandhian Virus, it places people in a situation where they're forced to think about other's safety, for their own too. Madhav also highlights how the wealthy sections of our population, small in size, have opted to bag peri-urban farm lands as their new investment zones for personal built property, and how they sprouted many farmhouse projects in the Delhi market. This was accmpanied by a rethinking of home living ideas, as a result of the pandemic. Anagram Architects have experienced significant influences to their vibrant and physically active studio environment, as bio-safety measures forced remote and slower modes of architecture practice.
When a vibrant design studio is distanced - Anagram, Madhav Raman

Important quotes from the discussion:

 

“Farmhouse projects have gone up in their number during the lockdown and I get a sense of why. It emerged from the long-standing paranoia with the upper-income groups who’re opportunistic. The shock to the real estate market was the drop in the number of commercial sales before the lockdown. The investable funds left undisposed went into the peri-urban lands after unlocking which has converted farmlands into farmhouses.”

“The idea of a home went through a transformation amongst a small section of the population during the lockdown. How my clients see themselves at home, and their understanding of what a home is has changed. It is now beyond things like work-from-home and the practicalities of services like WiFi. Many re-inventions are happening.”

“The projects that were relying on speculative markets with no funds now in place, but requiring buying from potential customers, or those that are seen as “ease of Architecture” with the developer-led projects, have taken a bashing.”

“As a disease, so little was known about COVID-19 and was frightening too. We have a fairly young team and hanging out together at work is a very important part of the studio experience. We did not face up to the fact that we may never come together again in the same numbers and for the same amount of time that we had spent before the lockdown. It’s a very lively studio that we run. But we had to shut it down.”

“There were psychological effects from the uncertainties, and with the information about the virus starting to circulate on how horrifying it can be. It felt horrifying like a movie that’s full of suspense and you don’t know whether you are going to die or if it is going to sweep by you without notice. So, I would say that it was a pretty good horror film, for as long as it lasted.”

“A psychological effect kicks in where the studio staff begin to feel that they can’t work productively at home. They also asked if the studio could be used again. But the curve of the number of cases wasn’t flattening. However, our office space is large enough luckily and we capped the number of people who could use it. We hence told our staff that everyone apart from the ones who feel the need to use the studio can stay home.”

“We have posters put up in our office and all our screensavers now have the “wash your hands and wear a mask” signs. We did this in preparation for the unlocks and we cleaned up our desks-spaces. Ours is a messy office.”

“I understand this virus as a Gandhian-Virus and that’s a crazy thing. You are supposed to wear a mask not just to protect yourself, but to save others from being infected. It’s an anti-intuitive sort of virus that doesn’t fit well into the usual levels of human selfishness. “

“A lot of our design comes from the conversations happening in the office. Our design development is verbal and conversational. We are a generally very talkative studio and we lost that essence. We could not achieve the same over Zoom calls. But over digital meetings, the lack of physical presence and body language shows how inefficient communication can be. Something that would take about 10 minutes to discuss in the office, can become a little bit longer.”

“We used to fight deadlines together. Everyone would just set-up a deadline to stay together as a team and thrash it out in the studio till it’s done. Everyone is forced to be a little more organized and there is also a way to handover tasks to someone else. But now, everyone did not work at the same time in the work-from-home format.”

“Discipline is a restriction of some kind. We hence create protocols and work through them. I won’t deny that the lockdown made us chop up the work process differently, taking into account that people are not available at the same time. We can’t have bright bulb moments now to quickly do something. When someone else has ideas too, they aren’t able to show what they have instantly. It’s hard to have work-days now, as they’re extended into work-weeks.”

“Before the pandemic, everything was devoted to work. We were running an architecture practice successfully, but then somehow the pandemic takes primacy. Our health, happiness and safety of our family members become important, and everything gets sacrificed on that altar.”

“The office still provides me with a lot of comforts and I rely on the back-end quite heavily. But the office has lost its physical centrality now. Personally too, I have experienced an increased significance of other people’s lives, which is humbling. Not dramatically in a Bollywood sort of way though. I took a month’s off to spend time with my grandparents which was gratifying. Before that, it was the usual spoiled-brat behaviour of me staying disconnected. This truly is a Gandhian virus where it forces you to think about the other person for your safety too.”

“We are witnessing a very interesting death of the city. There is always a certain morbidity to the city life. We know that heart disease, cancer, stress, unstable social life, unstable family life, psychological issues, negatives of the sedentary lifestyle, pollution, and many such ills exist in a city. We also are hurtling down this path of death, in the face of this planet’s destruction too in terms of climate crises, biodiversity loss and more. I believe we are going to witness the death of the city first and not the citizens.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Source - Deccan Chronicle

Wall As a Public Space
“To read public space only as a spatial condition, as a matter of square footage, zoning, or physical access, is to miss half the picture.”
—Reshma Esther Thomas

Reshma Esther Thomas examines how Hyderabad’s flyover pillars, painted with Cheriyal-style murals under the GHMC’s ‘City Art Scape’ initiative, reveal the paradox of managed public space. What appears to be beautification is actually cultural assertion in the wake of the 2014 bifurcation, bureaucratising a surface that once belonged to those without institutional power.

Read More »
Khazans in Slavador du Mundo, Bardez, Goa. © Kusum Priya (1)

The Map That Was Never Yours
“If publicness is reduced to what is legally accessible, then these landscapes were never public to begin with.”
—V.V. Kusum Priya

As part of our editorial: What makes a space public?, V.V. Kusum Priya argues that Section 39A of Goa’s 2024 Town and Country Planning Act this isn’t just a legal issue, and that it’s the erosion of an unrecognised but collectively sustained commons, and a question of what “public” really means and who benefits from the legislations surrounding this.

Read More »
Life on the public spaces in downtown Calcutta. Source - Wikimedia


“Appropriation of public spaces is the genesis of political movements, of ideological apparatus, and of endangering the city’s multi-dimensional fabric.”
—Dr. Seema Khanwalkar

Dr. Seema Khanwalkar, explores how the public spaces in India are dynamic, contested areas shaped by informal economies, migration, and social negotiation. She reveals how the transactional activities democratise ownership of these spaces, while the political and religious appropriation increasingly displaces this organic vitality, creating exclusion and anxiety. This shrinking of inclusive public space threatens urban social fabric, yet remains largely absent from city planning conversations, making it a far deeper crisis than mere encroachment.

Read More »
Sen Kapadia


“… people like Sen [Kapadia] don’t really leave. They become the questions we continue to ask.”
—A Tribute by Nuru Karim

Nuru Karim reflects on his relationship with Sen Kapadia through three transformative “states of being”—as a student, as a studio colleague, and as an independent professional. To capture Sen’s essence, Karim draws on three powerful metaphors: a mountain (commanding yet silent), a banyan tree (generous and sheltering), and a river (unseen yet ever-present). Together, these images paint a portrait of a man whose quiet depth left an indelible mark on all who encountered him.

Read More »
Sen Kapadia

Nirbhaya Nirgun
“Sen [Kapadia] found his own light early. He followed it without apology and without detour, and never let anyone dim it.”
—A Tribute by Pinkish Shah

Pinkish Shah’s homage to Sen Kapadia, celebrates him as fearless and formless in both life and work. Intellectually rooted in Louis Kahn and Sri Aurobindo, Sen pursued architecture that transcended form toward essential silence. Known for his courage, he maintained quiet, unwavering independence throughout his career.

Read More »
Prof Shireesh Atmaram Deshpande

“Professor Shireesh Deshpande chose the far more difficult task: to mould young minds into thoughtful, responsible, and rooted architects.”—A Tribute by Sarbjit Singh Bagha

Sarbjit Singh Bagha shares his tribute to Prof. Shireesh Atmaram Deshpande (1934–2026), a pioneering figure in Indian architectural education who passed away on 10 April 2026 at 91. Known affectionately as “Dada,” he spent nearly four decades at VNIT Nagpur, founding India’s first M.Arch. programme and introducing innovative pedagogy. He served as President of the Indian Institute of Architects (1992–1994). Choosing teaching over professional practice, he shaped generations of architects.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards