Architecture Disconnected

Architecture – Gadgets for the rich? – Gautam Bhatia

Architecture Disconnected

We talked to Gautam Bhatia about the role and relevance of architects today in the society, particularly India. We asked, ‘Has the profession distanced itself from the people at large? And, if it was only serving the elite?’ His response is following:

Editing and Transcription: Anupriya Saraswat

Architecture Disconnected

Architect Gautam Bhatia eloquently puts it, ‘architects aren’t really needed anymore.’

Architects have really isolated themselves. Our own work cycle has taken us away from city living and we are only capable of designing behind high boundary walls.” He comments, when asked about how Indian urbanscapes are continuously deteriorating, while rural development is carried out with little to no professional intervention – the resultant buildings being climate responsive and highly contextual.

Ar. Bhatia speaks about how contemporary architecture in India evolved as a problem solving technique, eschewing the more abstract ideals of art as one would observe in Europeans countries, and focussing instead on evolving a workable model for urban living in the newly independent nation. This particular approach to architecture, however, was what lent the momentum to post-independence development. As he says, “If you look at the history of architecture since independence, the initial impulse to employing architects was to engage them in a society which was essentially unmade. There was no thought of an urban society in India, after colonialism… In the race of development, we need the architect to perform many miracles. Just like medical miracles, architects were similarly called upon to contribute to the society. I think in the 70s and the 80s there was a much greater understanding of its potential to be a great problem solver.”

With the opening up of the economy and subsequent advent of globalization, this impulse has, however, largely disappeared. What was once a tool for urban expression and social development has now been reduced to a largely dispensable service availed almost exclusively by the rich. Ar. Bhatia talks about how our cities have become increasingly dreary – the dissonance markedly poignant given our rich history of urbanism – and how this beauty is now confined to enclosed enclaves. “In a country which has produced some of the most amazing landscapes and urbanscapes like Jaisalmer…It’s not that we need to go back to that, but the kind of sheer wretchedness of modern urban life is disheartening.”

This particular statement highlights how the disconnect between people and the profession has been largely our doing. Architects have distanced themselves from the larger picture, and what contributes to the spirit of an urban place. Architecture has shifted from an experiential art to a graphic art, with more and more focus on the outward appearance of buildings as a primary objective rather than its evolution as a product of planning. This shift from prioritizing function to prioritizing aesthetics highlights a worrying trend in India – architecture as an advertisement.

Architects are seen as essentially superfluous. They’ve become gadgets for the rich, useful to portray the client’s idea. All that, I think, is in the vein of advertising; a big villa, a big farmhouse, Aamby valley and Lavassa etc – many such places have come up where the essential thought has shifted to the rich who can afford architecture.

And therein lies the root cause of this disconnect. When architecture becomes a tool for advertising, buildings become a cluster of facilities – highlighted by the current trend of Builder-designed buildings, which exclusively develop luxury realty. This tendency neglects a vast chunk of the country’s population, essentially depriving them of availing an important service. “The work in the industry now is work for the really rich or for the really poor, and the middle class is nearly wiped out. The really rich are not interested in architectural ideas. Similarly, building for the poor – it should be a distillation of technology and architectural ideas, but now it’s down to only affordability. I think that’s happening everywhere, and the builders have wiped even the poor off the map.”

This brings up the concept of social conscience – which is missing right from the grassroots level. As a professional community, our focus has turned inwards, towards emulation and isolated expression as opposed to cohesive development linked to contextuality, suitability, and regional identity.  As Ar. Bhatia rightly puts it, “The minute you (as a student) say your concern is with farmhouses for the rich and not housing for the poor, then you’re starting out on the wrong foot. One of the great things about architecture was that it was social; a study of anthropology through buildings. You made buildings because you were a humanist, and because you could understand and mould human behaviour through the built environment. But now it has taken after commercial art, and people who will now become architects are not even taught the basics and will venture straight into 3-d programs and make views.

This is further exacerbated by the fact that architecture is closely tied in with polity, and hence must be essentially rooted in public welfare. But as this social conscience erodes, so does our relevance to the society as a whole. While the recent economic setback has definitely served as an eye-opener – exposing how most luxury realty is ridiculously inflated for vast profit margins, and hence shifting the demand somewhat towards architects, as opposed to builders, again – the fact remains that the first step towards regaining that relevance, and ultimately respect, is through shifting our focus towards designing for the masses, and not let globalization warp the inherent regionalism of the art.

A professional community which cannot cater to the needs – both implicit and explicit – of the populace it stems from, will be ultimately disregarded as redundant. The new crop of architects needs to step out of this self-congratulatory mind-set of perpetuating exclusivity – if not from the spirit of goodwill, then at least for the sake of self-preservation.

9 Responses

  1. I am amazed by the fact that this text has nothing fresh to contribute to an already popular opinion. All the low-hanging fruit have been picked. Conveniently ignoring government policies/regulations, politics, architecture education, market forces, new technology and general lack of awareness in everyday public. Decay in the discipline is easily blamed on the students. In my view, they are not creating but facing the problems stated in the piece. I see nothing wrong in wanting to design a farmhouse, or any other architectural object ”for the rich” as long as it involves the right values. And most of the time this is not a position one chooses while studying architecture but when he/she steps out from college into already deteriorating practices. There is no place for aspiring messiahs/saviors of the societies in the society itself. I have witnessed disgruntled urban designers working in interior design studios because in the end everybody has to pay their bills to survive. Portfolios laden with photo-realistic views are critical for young professionals to get internships or jobs. How about discussing the importance of drawings and new methods of representation? This could have been an interesting piece providing insights and inspiration to architecture students and professionals but instead it begins on the pessimistic note of ”architects aren’t really needed anymore”. Architecture intelligentsia need to get off that high horse and engage in dialogues reevaluating and redefining the place of architect in the contemporary Indian society.

Share your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Should you join the architecture course? People speak! 

When considering whether to enroll in the course of architecture or not, opinions of the graduates are strikingly divided, as was revealed in a recent Instagram poll. These mixed responses highlight the challenging yet potentially rewarding nature of a career in architecture.

Read More »

UNCAFE, New Delhi, by TI:DO

The Delhi-based studio Tangible Intangible Design Office (TI:DO) has designed a new outlet for a health-forward cafe, commissioned by a women-led brand UNCAFE.

Read More »

Special Mention | Belonging and Appropriations: A Dialogue

Urban displacement disrupts social networks, causing a sense of placelessness. Yet, people establish belonging through intangible connections—rituals, traditions, and shared experiences—shaping both mind and space as is explored by Aditi Suresh Kawade through this piece. The essay is a part of shortlisted entries for Urban Imprints essay writing contest, March-April 2024.

Read More »


ArchitectureLive! is hiring for various roles, starting from senior editors, content writers, research associates, graphic designer and more..