Satara Compeition, S+Ps Architects, Pinkish Shah

For People: Satara Municipal Corporation, competition entry by S+Ps – Pinkish Shah and Shilpa Gore

For People: Satara Municipal Corporation, competition entry by S+Ps - Pinkish Shah and Shilpa Gore.
Satara Compeition, S+Ps Architects, Pinkish Shah
For People: Satara Municipal Corporation, competition entry by S+Ps - Pinkish Shah and Shilpa Gore 1
Satara Municipal Corporation: Visualisation

Satara Municipal Corporation

The opening and last sentences of the preamble of the Indian Constitution, “We, the people… adopt, enact and give to ourselves this Constitution signifies that power is ultimately vested in the hands of the people. It interlays the basic tenet of governance and the relationship between the government and the people. However, this relationship of the people, for the people and by the people, with the government is rarely, if ever, enacted out in the spatial dimension of government buildings. The design of a new Satara Municipal Council building attempts to make this relationship between government and people more democratic, transparent, interactive and eventually participative.

It tries to achieve this via two primary ideas. The simplest of places is created when a group of people come together and gather under the shade of fabric cover, like a shamiana. The building’s primary gesture of the roof alludes to that. The site offered views to Ajinkyatara unique identifier for Satara- which we capitalized on to draw people up the building, much like the journey one takes from the base of the hill to the top at Ajinkyatara (Gadh chadla), As one ascends one notices governance “made transparent” and “in action” with government officials and representatives at work in the two wings on the sides. This “ritualistic pathway” through a series of stepped platforms where people can meet, gather and interact with each other and government officials, under the shade of the roof (and not in an introverted closed atrium), and in the benign climate of Satara, creates an OPEN PUBLIC PEOPLE’s PLACE for the citizenry of Satara.

As one reaches the observation platform at the top, the building responds with diagonal views opening out to Ajinkyatara fort, anchoring the building to its location. This diagonal orientation is embedded into the entire DNA of the building-with the structural system of the central bay, flooring patterns, furniture, etc. as also the thin sagging roof under which is the main council chamber, again completely glazed to expose its workings to the entire city when in session.

The offering of this approachable public place for the people of Satara, not just when they have official work, but to use and occupy as a truly public place rooted in its context, will go a long way toward making this project ‘of the people, for the people and by the people’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Architectural Legacy of Joseph Allen Stein - A Conversation between Meena Mani, Sudhish Mohindroo, and Mandira Nayar, at Triveni Kala Sangam. Source - Anuj Srivastava (1)

Remembering the Architectural Legacy of Joseph Allen Stein—A Conversation With Meena Mani and Sudhish Mohindroo

Anuj Srivastava recounts the conversation between Meena Mani and Sudhish Mohindroo, two architects who worked closely with Joseph Allen Stein, held at Triveni Kala Sangam. Through personal anecdotes, they illuminated Stein’s meticulous design philosophy, deep ecological sensitivity, and understated humanity across three landmark projects: Triveni Kala Sangam, India Habitat Centre, and the Sher-I-Kashmir International Conference Centre (previously Kashmir Conference Centre).

Read More »
Edwin Lutyens' bust which was replaced by C. Rajagopalachari's bust in Rashtrapathi Bhavan

“Changing The Statue Does Not Change the Room”—Geethu Gangadhar on Edwin Lutyens’ Bust Removal

The current Indian government replaced Edwin Lutyens’ bust with freedom fighter C. Rajagopalachari’s at Rashtrapati Bhavan, framing it as decolonisation. But symbolic gestures don’t dismantle colonial mindsets embedded in governance, caste, and institutions. Geethu Gangadhar raises an important question: whether this removal is a way to eradicate colonial baggage or systemic removal of history.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards