Collaborate to Consolidate – Manoj Kumar talks about Strategies for Architects

Collaborate to Consolidate - Manoj Kumar talks about Strategies for Architects 1
Design Team Planning for a New Project

When BuildingDesign compiled a list of the 100 largest architectural firms in the world, only 3 firms from India made the cut – Hafeez Contractor, CP Kukreja and Morphogenesis – accounting for less than 500 Indian architects. The remaining 100,000+ architects in the country work in smaller offices, with 90% of them having fewer than 10 employees.

Architectural practices work with many trades and professionals, with the finest people possessing exquisite skills. Architects possess an abundance of talent, creativity, resourcefulness and enterprise. Still, there is only so much a single architect or a small practice can do. There comes a time – when, with a stable output of consistent work – there is a desire to grow. At that moment, however, the practice is constrained, boxed in, held up tightly in wraps by human capabilities and bandwidth.

There are clients who are providing you ample opportunities to show your design and execution prowess, the projects are being completed on time and being appreciated by peers and the media, and the masons, carpenters and vendors are happy to work alongside – so what is the problem?

The problem is of growth – expanding the scale of what you are doing and taking up projects of increasing design complexity and budgets.

As a solo architect, you will miss out on being considered for projects which require a diverse skill set. Larger projects require multi- disciplinary teams, which a boutique practice finds difficult to gather together. Even if you are a specialist – for example, in landscape – you will need people from urban design, conservation, urban & regional planning, housing, project management, structural engineering, building services, interiors, environmental planning, transportation planning, computing, economics, sociology and the likes for handling projects above a certain scope.

Assembling a collaborative set of architects is a dynamic, long drawn process. The value systems must align and there should a basic level of commonality to hold the team together.

Creating a network of likeminded professionals, with who you can relate to at a personal and professional level, is important. Relationships and understanding take time to cement. With each project, you will ease your working styles together. So, start collaborating on smaller projects today.

The benefits of collaboration are for all the constituents. The rewards are split amongst all. Everyone comes out a winner, richer with enhanced exposure and a share of the larger project pie. The key benefits are:

  1. This collection of talent, as a consortium, stands a chance to be considered for the major projects initiated by the government or by funding agencies. Examples are projects arising out of the Smart Cities Mission or for creating master plans for corporates for integrated work and living townships.
  2. For the private sector clients, it will be a like a single window approach for their complex projects. There will be one entity, which will meet all the design and construction needs of the client. All the work will be shared amongst the participating consortium.
  3. You will be far more productive, do better work, and be updated on how your peers are working. You will make your practice sustainable and ready for the innovative disruptions in the years ahead.


So, architects – collaborate. That is the way to grow, evolve and create satisfying work.


Manoj Kumar - ArchTalkManoj Kumar has worked on over $5 BN worth projects, having been on investment review panels for community, industrial, office, commercial, leisure, airport, rail, road, healthcare infrastructure along with ecommerce & marketplace initiatives at Bharat Forge, TATA Steel, GE Capital and Apex Group (UK)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent

Source - Deccan Chronicle

Wall As a Public Space
“To read public space only as a spatial condition, as a matter of square footage, zoning, or physical access, is to miss half the picture.”
—Reshma Esther Thomas

Reshma Esther Thomas examines how Hyderabad’s flyover pillars, painted with Cheriyal-style murals under the GHMC’s ‘City Art Scape’ initiative, reveal the paradox of managed public space. What appears to be beautification is actually cultural assertion in the wake of the 2014 bifurcation, bureaucratising a surface that once belonged to those without institutional power.

Read More »
Khazans in Slavador du Mundo, Bardez, Goa. © Kusum Priya (1)

The Map That Was Never Yours
“If publicness is reduced to what is legally accessible, then these landscapes were never public to begin with.”
—V.V. Kusum Priya

As part of our editorial: What makes a space public?, V.V. Kusum Priya argues that Section 39A of Goa’s 2024 Town and Country Planning Act this isn’t just a legal issue, and that it’s the erosion of an unrecognised but collectively sustained commons, and a question of what “public” really means and who benefits from the legislations surrounding this.

Read More »
Life on the public spaces in downtown Calcutta. Source - Wikimedia


“Appropriation of public spaces is the genesis of political movements, of ideological apparatus, and of endangering the city’s multi-dimensional fabric.”
—Dr. Seema Khanwalkar

Dr. Seema Khanwalkar, explores how the public spaces in India are dynamic, contested areas shaped by informal economies, migration, and social negotiation. She reveals how the transactional activities democratise ownership of these spaces, while the political and religious appropriation increasingly displaces this organic vitality, creating exclusion and anxiety. This shrinking of inclusive public space threatens urban social fabric, yet remains largely absent from city planning conversations, making it a far deeper crisis than mere encroachment.

Read More »
Sen Kapadia


“… people like Sen [Kapadia] don’t really leave. They become the questions we continue to ask.”
—A Tribute by Nuru Karim

Nuru Karim reflects on his relationship with Sen Kapadia through three transformative “states of being”—as a student, as a studio colleague, and as an independent professional. To capture Sen’s essence, Karim draws on three powerful metaphors: a mountain (commanding yet silent), a banyan tree (generous and sheltering), and a river (unseen yet ever-present). Together, these images paint a portrait of a man whose quiet depth left an indelible mark on all who encountered him.

Read More »

Featured Publications

New Release

Stories that provoke enquiry into built environment

www.architecture.live

Subscribe & Join a Community of Lakhs of Readers

We Need Your Support

To be able to continue the work we are doing and keeping it free for all, we request our readers to support in every way possible.

Your contribution, no matter the size, helps our small team sustain this space. Thank you for your support.

Contribute using UPI

Contribute Using Cards